Concrete Steps to Breaking the “Glass Ceiling”

March 23rd, 2010 12 comments

The convo over @ Prof. Stackhouse’s blog “On Behalf of Diversity in Academic Hiring” has been heating up and I for one am thrilled it is taking place. I must admit however that I was somewhat disarmed when he challenged us to provide concrete steps towards progress; “particular things we can do, or particular people we should look at, etc.” Disarmed in the sense that while this has been something I’ve thought about a lot, I must confess I found myself somewhat unable to answer that question. If I may dwell on the theoretical just a bit longer I would say that the glass ceiling has to be cracked from above, engendering participation, and I think this is a theologically-grounded sentiment. The concrete however is a lot harder. How do we break the “glass ceiling”? Is it as simple as intentional hiring? What other concrete steps can be taken? Who has done this successfully and how have they accomplished it (towards what ends?)

Is Incarnational Ministry Possible in a Commuter City?

March 21st, 2010 2 comments

As per a great post I read on Pastor John Lee’s blog on A Perspective on the Transience of People in (NY) City… whilst in the Pacific NW I’ve learned the deep value of being in, for, and with a neighborhood as a church and while I hope to transplant this ethos to our (hopeful) move this summer to NY I can’t help but to wonder if it really works (out there). As I recall growing up on the subway – everyone commutes. And life is spent in different sectors of the metro area; i.e., you might work in the burbs, but play in the city, and sleep out on the Island… life isn’t centralized in NYC in other words. So I wonder about this commuter tension when it comes to building a church in NY… how does one legitimately minister to a neighborhood and not live there? Should we fight against the commuter tendency or work around it? Or take, for example, a church like Redeemer; what percentage live in the city, or more specifically the upper West Side (& various locales) and what percentage commutes in for church, and how is that viewed?

Book Review: Paul Stevens’ “The Equipping Pastor: A Systems Approach to Congregational Leadership”

March 20th, 2010 No comments

I read this book for a class report and found it quite good; here’s what I had to say in the report, hence the “stiff” language:

This is a really good book. My appraisal has as its context a conversation I had with a denominational leader a few years back regarding my performance as a church planter. He said, “Wayne, you are not a process-oriented person.” Instead of chafing, I took that to heart and found it to be a necessary critique; this book has furthered my self-understanding along those same lines.

If I might summarize my understanding of this book in one word, it would be “chemistry”. We often overlook this necessary dimension to pastoral ministry, viewing it from a rather utilitarian perspective, and the resultant breakdown in congregation-pastor relationship is often not necessarily due to “incompatibility” (60), but a failure to adjust leadership style. As such, the drive of this book is to bring about personal awareness in our pastoral approach, making strategic and wise adjustments, facilitating chemistry with persistence and patience, leading to culture-making. In this sense, the wise pastor recognizes his / her role as “environmental engineer” (46), essentially, the biblical ideal of discernment. I appreciate this emphasis on pastoral “fit” as necessity, but not limitation. Like marriage, an ill-fitting arrangement can be avoided; but at the same time, an ill-fitting arrangement need not signal divorce.

I also find useful reflection on the nature of congregation, especially as it pertains to my continued interest in the field of church planting. On page 17, I find listed the qualities of a “well-differentiated person”, characteristics that I also perceive are necessary for a strong planting core group. Conversely, I also resonate with the wisdom on page 97, that “a major component of Christian growth involves learning to love and relate to brothers and sisters in Christ who were not personally chosen.” I hear Bonhoeffer’s dictum in the background; “he who loves community destroys community”, essentially warning us of the “idealization” of who we want around us, i.e., the “ideal” core group. No such thing.

This is a book I intend to reference continually in my pastoral vocation. And I’m asking my wife to read it as well; her background in Family/Child Development runs a similar course of thought, and I will need her wisdom in the process. In the end, I think we will have learned from our past mistakes, but this systems approach helps me in re-approaching core development, congregational chemistry, and hopefully launching a great community.

Is Seminary Really a “Cemetary”? (i.e., I AM FREAKIN TIRED)

March 18th, 2010 18 comments

Pardon my French s’il vous plais.

I’ve been groaning under the weight of finishing off my MDiv and the words of Scot McKnight perfectly capture what I’ve been feeling:

Rarely has so much been expected of so few. Those in ministry are expected to be competent in church history, systematic theology, ethics, apologetics, contemporary social analysis, Christian education, missions, evangelism, homiletics and psychology. At the same time, they are expected to master at least two archaic languages – and these, it is often claimed, must be reduced in palatable form for the person on the street! (McKnight, NT Greek Grammatical Analysis)

I just LOVE that quote.

And it explains much of how I feel – (I admit, I’m complaining) so it begs the question – WHO NEEDS ALL OF THIS STUFF?

And my answer is:

Read more…

4 people like this post.

“European-Based Races Excel Academically & Intellectually Over Other Races” Thoughts on Affirmative Action

March 17th, 2010 9 comments

I’m befuddled. I’ve been involved in a discussion about why there aren’t more minorities and women in academia – not just enrolled but teaching from the ivory tower. One can argue that there just aren’t many – period. Underlying this assumption is that minorities and women are second-rate by academic standards, unable to compete professionally and so they get strained out in the qualification process. Hence affirmative action. Does it bring in less-than-qualified teachers just for the sake of political-correctness? Or does it truly elevate and enhance the educational experience (as opposed to dilute the standards) to have minorities and women on board? Here is one comment from the convo from a random, but thoughtful blogger; I don’t appreciate the sarcasm and usually don’t entertain arguments with total strangers. But this one brings up important and unavoidable issues for me personally. I covet your thoughts.

Read more…

10 Symptoms of Emotionally UNHealthy Spirituality – by Pete Scazzero

March 4th, 2010 5 comments

I found this post via a RT and it’s stuck in my head for the past day or so. That’s when I know I’ve read something important. I mean REALLY important. If you’re (spiritually) burned-out, take some time to read this – THE TOP TEN SYMPTOMS OF EMOTIONALLY UNHEALTHY SPIRITUALITY – it’s that good… and maybe it will save your life. All those 10 “symptoms” I’ve known intimately; no wonder I was a depression-laden wreck over a decade ago when experiencing those; spiritual-superman may be a title we covet, but it’s a prescription for self-martyrdom if you ask me, and there’s nothing great about that. I like the adage: “I prefer to burn like coal – long and deep, as opposed to petrol – which flares up in a flash and disappears quickly.” So here for your edification are those 10 symptoms listed briefly (and pls do read  the above link as well!): Read more…

Pulling the Plug on a Church Plant

February 27th, 2010 2 comments

It’s amazing how some traffic comes my way via the most interesting google searches. I thought the above title was an interesting search that led to my blog so I’ll elaborate. Dave Ingland’s a neat guy I got to know thru networking and he recently interviewed me on his blog about closing a church plant. I purposely didn’t toot this horn only because honestly, I’m not proud of it. But truth be told I am hearing more and more day after day how some leading figures out there had somewhere in their past the painful experience of closing down a plant, only to get it right further down the road. Experience really does help. And Don Robinson, who was a planting coach to me from the North Pacific Conference of the ECC once told me it’s about the right combination of the right planter for the right locale at the right time with the right people. I think he’s spot on. At any rate, here’s the interview: Read more…

The (Institutional) Church Is Like The Bark On A Tree

February 24th, 2010 4 comments

It’s amazing how often I come back to this quote by Eugene Peterson in Christianity Today; I talked about it at Metro Church in NJ last Sunday, and citing it again as I write a paper on pietism of the ECC. It’s not the first time I’ve cited it. It’s an important analogy (especially when you consider it was first made by Catholic theologian Frederich von Hugel which makes you go “hmm…” even more). Here it is with emphasis added: Read more…

Is Social Justice The Modern Sacrament?

February 13th, 2010 1 comment

Importing this hotly contested question into the blog, I wanted to open the debate up to a wider audience. So this was the debate du jour – in the pecking order which is more important: social justice or evangelism? Now it would seem politically (and theologically) correct especially in post-modern circles to say “both are equally important”. The pushback however came from one of my profs Hans Boersma who contends that social justice, while important, is only a means to the end, i.e., salvation, and not an end in itself. He used the comparison, “what is more important; bread that feeds the stomach or bread that gives eternal life?” reflecting his strong sacramental orientation; as such can we say that social justice stands alone as sacramental act? Is it a greater thing, or on par with, or less than, social justice?

Obama and Niebuhr: Keeping it Real

February 7th, 2010 No comments

Found an interesting link via buddy Clement Wen on Prez Obama’s “favorite philosopher”, Reinhold Niebuhr (h/t cnn.com). The article does a good job summarizing Niebuhr’s practical theology, sometimes called “Christian Realism”, w/o divulging too much of the controversial qualities (alleged Marxism, social gospel – ha! I just did it). But there was one thing I really appreciate about Niebuhr’s approach; as a pastor among Detroit auto factory workers, he wrestled with a religion that was fast becoming bourgeois; that is to say, the intellectual religion of the upper and middle classes. He sought a reversal that was uncommon for his time, re-interpreting the faith for the blue-collar class, for the average midWesterner. He was ascending the commoner; he was the original advocate of “main street”, and while an intellectual, he kept it real. Now the question is, has Obama done the same?

1 person likes this post.

Switch to our mobile site