<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keeping the Evangelical Edge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waynepark.com/2009/12/10/keeping-the-evangelical-edge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waynepark.com/2009/12/10/keeping-the-evangelical-edge/</link>
	<description>WAYNEPARK.COM: meditations on faith &#124; place &#124; race</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://waynepark.com/2009/12/10/keeping-the-evangelical-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waynepark.com/?p=1414#comment-627</guid>
		<description>I probably agree in great measure with Barr (of course, he famously called biblical scholars to account for their sloppy use of biblical words. I talk about this in my book on Herman Utics), but additional, who gets to define &quot;scholarship&quot;? I&#039;m going to do a post on this, or somewhat related. &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-626&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Wayne &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I probably agree in great measure with Barr (of course, he famously called biblical scholars to account for their sloppy use of biblical words. I talk about this in my book on Herman Utics), but additional, who gets to define &#8220;scholarship&#8221;? I&#8217;m going to do a post on this, or somewhat related. <a href="#comment-626" rel="nofollow">@Wayne </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://waynepark.com/2009/12/10/keeping-the-evangelical-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-626</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waynepark.com/?p=1414#comment-626</guid>
		<description>James Barr attacks evangelical scholarship as &quot;phoney&quot; and evangelical piety as &quot;pathological&quot;: http://ow.ly/LirH via Twitter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Barr attacks evangelical scholarship as &#8220;phoney&#8221; and evangelical piety as &#8220;pathological&#8221;: <a href="http://ow.ly/LirH" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/LirH</a> via Twitter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://waynepark.com/2009/12/10/keeping-the-evangelical-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waynepark.com/?p=1414#comment-625</guid>
		<description>Additionally, we need to remember that theology is primarily for the church, not for the academy. The academy has much to offer us, but it does not own theology and biblical studies.  I think it is a mistake to glorify, as we sometimes do, the great academicians as if they &quot;really&quot; know the Bible, as if huge amounts of knowledge of an academic field gets you closer to God. Without dismissing that knowledge...  let&#039;s keep the focus on the church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Additionally, we need to remember that theology is primarily for the church, not for the academy. The academy has much to offer us, but it does not own theology and biblical studies.  I think it is a mistake to glorify, as we sometimes do, the great academicians as if they &#8220;really&#8221; know the Bible, as if huge amounts of knowledge of an academic field gets you closer to God. Without dismissing that knowledge&#8230;  let&#8217;s keep the focus on the church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
