<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Theology of Sex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waynepark.com/2009/01/06/a-theology-of-sex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waynepark.com/2009/01/06/a-theology-of-sex/</link>
	<description>WAYNEPARK.COM: meditations on faith &#124; place &#124; race</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Lee</title>
		<link>http://waynepark.com/2009/01/06/a-theology-of-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waynepark.wordpress.com/?p=921#comment-221</guid>
		<description>On a sidetone, that&#039;s a beautiful print.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a sidetone, that&#8217;s a beautiful print.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Park</title>
		<link>http://waynepark.com/2009/01/06/a-theology-of-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waynepark.wordpress.com/?p=921#comment-220</guid>
		<description>@Jay - u can&#039;t change that picture unless you sign up an account @ Wordpress. Sorry I can&#039;t do anything on my end either :(

@ Caleb - thanks for visiting - yea we wanna be careful of doing eisegesis - and reading our own interpret in to the text... still I wonder what exactly they were thinking when they first canonized Songs? I really think they thought it was allegorical... or maybe not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jay &#8211; u can&#8217;t change that picture unless you sign up an account @ WordPress. Sorry I can&#8217;t do anything on my end either <img src='http://waynepark.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@ Caleb &#8211; thanks for visiting &#8211; yea we wanna be careful of doing eisegesis &#8211; and reading our own interpret in to the text&#8230; still I wonder what exactly they were thinking when they first canonized Songs? I really think they thought it was allegorical&#8230; or maybe not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb &#38; Sol</title>
		<link>http://waynepark.com/2009/01/06/a-theology-of-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb &#38; Sol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 04:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waynepark.wordpress.com/?p=921#comment-219</guid>
		<description>Depending on how you define theology, I think you could make a case for there being a theology of everything; a theology of sex, a theology of coffee, a theology of computers, whatever.  I think you can systematically apply God&#039;s revelation to any contemporary or ancient situation, and call it a theology.  It might be a wrong theology in some cases, but it is a theology nonetheless.

Thanks for your words.

-Sol
www.calebandsol.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depending on how you define theology, I think you could make a case for there being a theology of everything; a theology of sex, a theology of coffee, a theology of computers, whatever.  I think you can systematically apply God&#8217;s revelation to any contemporary or ancient situation, and call it a theology.  It might be a wrong theology in some cases, but it is a theology nonetheless.</p>
<p>Thanks for your words.</p>
<p>-Sol<br />
<a href="http://www.calebandsol.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.calebandsol.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://waynepark.com/2009/01/06/a-theology-of-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waynepark.wordpress.com/?p=921#comment-218</guid>
		<description>How do I change this lil&#039; green picture - this really isn&#039;t me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do I change this lil&#8217; green picture &#8211; this really isn&#8217;t me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://waynepark.com/2009/01/06/a-theology-of-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waynepark.wordpress.com/?p=921#comment-217</guid>
		<description>Good Morning,

Okay foot in mouth syndrome before I go to work. I believe the Song of Solomon addresses both, and shows there is no shame in sex with your beloved. To me it speaks of the beautey that can/should be found in relationship (legal/marriage).  I also think it speaks to the total passion the Lord has for the church. As we (I) seek to grow closer tot he Lord, and intentionally make Him, and keep Him in my first love position of my life - how far will I go? What will I risk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning,</p>
<p>Okay foot in mouth syndrome before I go to work. I believe the Song of Solomon addresses both, and shows there is no shame in sex with your beloved. To me it speaks of the beautey that can/should be found in relationship (legal/marriage).  I also think it speaks to the total passion the Lord has for the church. As we (I) seek to grow closer tot he Lord, and intentionally make Him, and keep Him in my first love position of my life &#8211; how far will I go? What will I risk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
